Product Requirements Document: LLM-Powered Content Scoring and Summarization
Overview
This document outlines the requirements for an LLM-powered system that analyzes content, generates relevance scores based on user profiles, and provides personalized content filtering. This system is a core component of the InsightHub platform, aiming to deliver a highly personalized and relevant content experience to users. It solves the problem of information overload by surfacing content that aligns with a user's specific interests and expertise.
Core Features
-
LLM-based Content Analysis and Scoring:
- What it does: Analyzes content from sources like YouTube and Reddit against a user's profile to generate a relevance score (0-100), a list of relevant categories, an explanation for the score, and a concise summary.
- Why it's important: This is the core of the personalization engine, ensuring users see content that matters to them.
- How it works: A
ContentAnalyzerclass will use LangChain and an OpenAI model to process content and user data, returning a structuredContentRelevanceobject.
-
Personalized Content Filtering:
- What it does: Filters the incoming content feed, showing only items that meet a minimum relevance threshold.
- Why it's important: Prevents users from being overwhelmed by irrelevant content, improving engagement.
- How it works: A
ContentFilterclass will use theContentAnalyzerto score a list of content items and return only those that pass the relevance threshold.
-
User Feedback Loop:
- What it does: Allows users to provide feedback (e.g., like/dislike) on content, which then updates their user profile.
- Why it's important: Continuously improves the accuracy of the personalization algorithm over time.
- How it works: A
FeedbackProcessorwill adjust the weights of a user's interests in their profile based on their interactions.
User Experience
- User Personas: The primary user is a professional or enthusiast who wants to stay up-to-date on specific topics without wading through irrelevant noise.
- Key User Flows:
- User onboards and defines their interests.
- User browses a personalized feed of content.
- User consumes content and provides feedback (likes/dislikes).
- The system learns from feedback and further refines the feed.
- UI/UX Considerations: The UI should clearly display the relevance score and summary for each piece of content. Feedback mechanisms should be simple and intuitive.
Technical Architecture
- System Components:
ContentAnalyzer: Python class using LangChain and OpenAI.ContentFilter: Python class to filter content lists.FeedbackProcessor: Python class to handle user feedback.ContentScorer: Orchestrator node to integrate the analyzer.
- Data Models:
UserProfile: Pydantic model for user preferences.ContentRelevance: Pydantic model for the output of the analysis.
- APIs and Integrations:
- OpenAI API for LLM access.
- Supabase for storing user profiles and content metadata.
- Integration with existing YouTube and Reddit data pipelines.
- Infrastructure Requirements: Standard Python environment with necessary libraries. No major infrastructure changes are required.
Development Roadmap
-
MVP Requirements:
- Implement the
UserProfileandContentRelevancePydantic models. - Build the core
ContentAnalyzerclass. - Develop the
ContentFilterand integrate it into the existing content pipelines. - Update the
ContentScorerorchestrator node. - Modify the database schema to store relevance scores.
- Implement the
-
Future Enhancements:
- Implement the
FeedbackProcessorto enable the user feedback loop. - Develop a more sophisticated user interest model.
- Add support for more content sources.
- Explore different LLMs for analysis.
- Implement the
Logical Dependency Chain
- Foundation: The
UserProfileandContentRelevancemodels must be defined first, as they are the data contracts for the system. - Core Logic: The
ContentAnalyzeris the next critical piece, as it contains the core intelligence. - Integration: The
ContentFiltercan then be built, followed by its integration into the YouTube and Reddit processors and the orchestrator. - Persistence: The database schema must be updated to store the output of the analysis.
- Feedback Loop: The
FeedbackProcessorcan be built last, as it is an enhancement to the core filtering functionality.
Risks and Mitigations
- Technical Challenges:
- Risk: The LLM may not provide consistently accurate relevance scores.
- Mitigation: Extensive testing with a diverse set of content and user profiles. Fine-tuning prompts and potentially the model itself.
- MVP Scope:
- Risk: The MVP scope could become too large.
- Mitigation: Strictly adhere to the defined MVP requirements and defer enhancements to a later phase.
- Resource Constraints:
- Risk: OpenAI API costs could be higher than expected.
- Mitigation: Implement caching for content analysis results. Monitor API usage closely and optimize where possible.
Appendix
- Research Findings: Initial research indicates that using LangChain with Pydantic output parsers is an effective way to get structured, reliable data from LLMs. The key is well-crafted prompts that clearly define the desired output format.
- Technical Specifications: The detailed implementation plan can be found in the Taskmaster task description for ID #34.